| FENCERS QUARTERLY MAGAZINE - ONLINE |
||||||||||||
| Articles | Reviews | Subscribe | The Print Store | Writer’s Guidelines |
||||||||||||
![]() |
The Fencer’s Body - The Free Arm (PART II) By Nick Evangelista |
|||||||||||
| Modern fencing scorns the free arm. Its only point is to hang limply at the fencer’s side. The French call it the "elephant’s trunk". Once upon a time, fencers held the back arm up, straight out from the shoulder at a forty-five degree angle, and then straight up at the elbow. The hand was held limply. Beginning fencers tend to think this looks dumb or silly. I’ve heard one explanation that swordsmen used to hold their hand this way because they were holding a lantern in their free hand. This is erroneous. They did occasionally employ lanterns. They also used daggers, cloaks, mailed gloves, and extra swords. But in those cases, the free hand was held forward, not back, as it had a role in offensive-defensive maneuvering. So-called "advanced" sport fencers think of holding the free arm up as an affectation of another age, a useless holdover of polite, artsy, eighteenth- nineteenth century fencing, a kind of ballet with swords. Moreover, it is asserted by many modern teachers that holding the free arm up cause the shoulders to become tense. Their thought is that dropping the arm "keeps the shoulders relaxed, and so promotes freer movement". Sounds reasonable, huh? Unfortunately, it doesn’t work that way. The free arm does have a purpose in fencing. Actually, it has a number of purposes, all of which are totally lost when the arm is allowed to drop downward. Certainly, there is some initial tension in the shoulders when one assumes the classical fencing position during the early stages of fencing training, but it passes as the fencing student learns to relax with fencing in general. I have been fencing for thirty-three years, and I can assure you that the initial tension is replaced by relaxation, if the student perseveres. So, in actuality, dropping the free arm has become a short-term fix for lazy fencers. |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
| What’s wrong with this picture? Notice that the absence of the free arm’s counterbalance places the fencer’s balance forward, putting more weight on his front foot. This slows movement responses, and the fencer is reduced from smooth accelerations and retreats to uncontrolled stepping and running. |
||||||||||||
| So, what do we gain by using the free arm in a classical style? First off, the free arm held up acts as a counter-balance. It keeps you upright, promoting a balanced position whereby your body weight remains distributed equally on both legs. This is a good thing for fencers who don’t want to fall down. Holding the arm at a forty-five degree angle from your torso, keeps your body angled in relationship to your opponents, giving them as little straight-on target area as possible. When the bent arm is snapped straight back from our classical position, it adds to the acceleration of the lunge ("for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction"). Once you are in the lunge, the straight arm held behind you, with the free hand held palm-up in supination, helps you to remain balanced. In simple language, it keeps your backside from sticking out. Then, when you come back on guard from the lunge, pulling the back arm up quickly aids in the recovery. Keeping the free arm up when you are on guard keeps your arm out of the line of fire, as well. Consider this: fencers receive calls against them for "covering a valid target area" with the free arm -- this simply could not happen if the arm was held correctly behind them. Finally, your back arm serves as a rudder, like the steering pole on the rear of a boat. If you use it properly, it will steer you straight ahead, enhancing your point control. As far as I can tell, all these are positive things. Now, let’s look at the fencer who has been seduced to the dark side of the force. He drops his sword arm because this is what he was taught to do. Oops! He loses balance. Without a counter-balance, his weight shifts to his front leg. Now, all he can do is step or run or jump at his opponent. He is constantly off balance. If he has fenced for a while, he probably has, or will, hurt his front knee or ankle since his weight constantly shifts unevenly as he moves. When he drops his free arm to his side, his sword arm shifts sideways toward the outside line (opening his inside line), and his chest squares to his opponent, exposing his entire chest to an easy attack. When his sword arm moves to the outside when he is on guard, he will automatically make wider parries. And, to be sure, hanging at his side like a wet noodle, his free arm will not help him with his lunge, his balance, or his recovery. But, he will have relaxed shoulders. Nice trade-off. |
||||||||||||
| Articles | Reviews | Subscribe | The Print Store | Writer’s Guidelines |
||||||||||||
| Copyright © VFQ/FQM Founded by Bruce Darling in 1996-2007 All rights reserved. Web design by Turning Records Online – 1999-2007 |
||||||||||||