![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FENCERS QUARTERLY MAGAZINE ONLINE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| How to thrust twoo foote, farter than anie Englishman... |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| by J. Christoph Amberger |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ONE STEP BEYOND |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vincentio's last boast has been interpreted as one of the earliest allusions to the lunge proper. Yet this attack is missing from the repertoire he presents in his book: Vincentio's attacks are predominantly made on the pass, the point being carried to (and into) the target with a forward step. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| But as Gaugler* points out, Viggiani (1575) had already mentioned the large step with the right foot. And Marozzo (1536) included punta lunga, an extension of the arm combined with an additiona; movement of the right foot after the execution of the pass. As far as illustration go, Meyer's Gruendtliche Beschreibung of 1570 (Figs 2 and 3) shows something very closely resembling the lunge being executed at a stationary target with a rapier,as well as during a bout at swords. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| So what can we make of Vincentio's conciliatory offer to let Bart Bramble in on his botte segreta? Is it really Bramble's ticket into a new world of sophistication and innovation? Or did the lunge already belong in the Maisters' combative repertoire? After all, Bramble felt fit enough to offer Saviolo a chance to play at the Italian's very own weapons of choice... |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SIGNS OF THE TIMES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| To get a better feeling for the role of the complex attack of the lunge in 16th-century fencing, we'd need to find out what its functions were. In an antagonistic combative scenario, the tactical forte of the lunge is the surprise element it adds to working with distance. But it requires full linear commitment to do harm to an opponent: the straight arm is absolutely necessary to transmit the full force of the lunge into and through the target. Which means that as the body weight is propelled forward through the straightening of the back leg, it needs to be tightly focused on the miniscule surface area of the point. This advantage of the unsuspected strike from distance, however, probably played only a minor role in the native combative culture of Elizabethan England. An experienced antagonist would be able to take advantage of the linear commitment of the attack, either by removing target area (via a volte), or by taking advantage of the wonderful stability of his True Guardant Ward. (The latter would have provided the opportunity for a powerful and lightning-fast counter-attack against the wrist or lower arm of the lunging attacker.) In the English system of the Noble Art, the True and False Times provided a simple but accurate grid of classifying offensive and defensive actions according to comparative speed. The lunge, by virtue of the body parts involved in its proper execution, involved the True Times of the hand, the body, and the feet: To reach the opponent, the arm has to be straightened, and the entire body weight has to be accelerated from a standstill to the speed necessary for penetration. By definition, it could be defeated by the action of the hand (a stop cut), the time of the hand and body (maybe a parry and a leaning back of the upper body), and the time of the hand, body, and foot (a volte). As such, it would not have played a major role in the Masters' offensive repertoire. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PART 1, PART 2, PART 3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © Fencers Quarterly Magazine 1996-2008 All rights reserved. Fencers Quarterly Magazine, 848 South Kimbrough, Springfield, MO 65806 Web design by Turning Records Online – 1999-2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fencing gear for the Fencer's Brain |
| PART II |
| ARTICLES |